ADDENDUM TO
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS
IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04022
COUNSEL: NONE
HEARING DESIRED: YES
________________________________________________________________
APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:
He be allowed to serve in the enlisted force for one year to
prove that he has the capacity to serve and complete his active
duty service commitment (ADSC) for the cost of his advanced
education at the United States Air Force Academy (USAFA).
________________________________________________________________
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
A similar appeal was considered and denied by the Board, on
2 Aug 11. For an accounting of the facts and circumstances
surrounding the application, and, the rationale of the earlier
decision by the Board, see the Record of Proceedings at
Exhibit F, with attachments.
The applicant submits a request for reconsideration, contending
now that he should be allowed to serve in the Air Force Reserve
or the Regular Air Force for one year to prove that he has the
capacity to serve in the enlisted force to reimburse the
government for the cost of his advanced education at the USAFA.
If not, then he should be given another option other than to
monetarily pay for the cost of his education.
In support of his appeal, the applicant provides a personal
statement; copies of letters of recommendation and commendation
from former classmates and his employer; extracts from his
official USAFA records, and other supporting documents.
The applicants complete submission, with attachments, is at
Exhibit G.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:
In an earlier finding, the Board determined there was
insufficient evidence to warrant corrective action. We have
reviewed the new information provided in support of his appeal;
however, we do not find it sufficient to overturn the earlier
decision of the Board. While we empathize with the applicant,
we do not find that he has been the victim of an error or
injustice. In view of the above, we find no basis upon which to
recommend favorable consideration of the applicants request.
The applicant's case is adequately documented and it has not
been shown that a personal appearance with or without counsel
will materially add to our understanding of the issue(s)
involved. Therefore, the request for a hearing is not favorably
considered.
________________________________________________________________
THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:
The applicant be notified that the evidence presented did not
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; that
the application was denied without a personal appearance; and
that the application will only be reconsidered upon the
submission of newly discovered relevant evidence not considered
with this application.
________________________________________________________________
The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket
Number BC-2010-04022 in Executive Session on 2 October 2012,
under the provisions of AFI 36-2603:
The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit F. Record of Proceedings, dated 15 Aug 11,
with exhibits.
Exhibit G. Letter, Applicant, dated 27 Feb 12,
with attachments.
Panel Chair
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04022
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2010-04022 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO ________________________________________________________________ THE APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be allowed to serve in the enlisted force to complete his active duty service commitment (ADSC) for the cost of his advanced education at the United States Air Force Academy (USAFA). The recommendation of the Superintendent to either support...
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-02457
The Superintendent, the disenrollment authority, agreed with the CSRP and disenrolled the applicant, ordered him to reimburse the government for the costs of his Academy education by serving three years active duty in an enlisted capacity, but also granted him an educational delay to seek a commissioning source other than the Academy. As noted above, the Superintendent determined that the applicant should reimburse the government for the costs of the Academy education by serving in an...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2000-03245
There is no indication that the applicant was forced to take advance leave with pay prior to entering the Air Force Academy as a basic cadet. Applicant's complete response, with attachments, is attached at Exhibit E. _________________________________________________________________ ADDITIONAL AIR FORCE EVALUATION: Pursuant to the Board’s request, the Chief Pay Services, HQ USAFA/FMFC, reviewed the application and states that cadets receive advance pay for clothing and equipment purchases. ...
AF | BCMR | CY2008 | BC-2007-02233
_________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT: When he left the USAFA he made the wrong decision to reimburse the Air Force for his debt he incurred for his education, rather than serve on active duty as an enlisted member. He requested to be considered for an educational delay to pursue an Air Force Reserve Officer Training Commission and was given until 17 Jun 05, to submit additional matters to support his request. The SECAF granted his...
AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01050
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01050 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: The $112,654.00 debt he incurred for the cost of his education at the United States Air Force Academy (USAFA) be reduced to the amount of $28,396.00. In support of this request, the applicant provides a personal statement, and various documents related to his appeal. In a letter dated 12 May 2015,...
AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 02158
Denying his degree is excessive punishment for his actions. ________________________________________________________________ STATEMENT OF FACTS: The applicant was a cadet at the USAFA Air Force Academy from 26 June 2006 through 13 May 2013. The basis of the applicants disenrollment is sufficient to deny his degree from the USAFA.
AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC 2007 00975 1
For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicants request, and the rationale for the earlier decision of the Board, see the Record of Proceedings, with attachments, at Exhibit F. By letter, undated, the applicant requests reconsideration of his request, contending he has served on active duty in the United States Army for over three years. An advisory prepared by USAF/JAA recommended denial and stated the statute provides for recoupment via service on active duty...
AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2007-00975-1
For an accounting of the facts and circumstances surrounding the applicants request, and the rationale for the earlier decision of the Board, see the Record of Proceedings, with attachments, at Exhibit F. By letter, undated, the applicant requests reconsideration of his request, contending he has served on active duty in the United States Army for over three years. An advisory prepared by USAF/JAA recommended denial and stated the statute provides for recoupment via service on active duty...
AF | BCMR | CY2003 | BC-2002-03928
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-03928 INDEX CODE: 104.00 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His debt for the cost of his United States Air Force Academy (USAFA) education be waived. On 15 Mar 01, the applicant acknowledged receipt of the notification and elected not to waive his right to present his case before a Board of...
AF | BCMR | CY2004 | BC-2004-02260
The following background information was extracted from the 27 Mar 97 USAFA Military Review Committee (MRC) Action Executive Summary and related attachments: As a 4th classman, the applicant was counseled in Mar 95 about an unprofessional relationship with a female 2nd classman. _________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: The 10th Medical Group commander (10MDG/CC), USAFA, advised he did not have the applicant’s medical record from 1997 because...